tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post4801571808569553366..comments2023-09-03T18:08:09.488+05:30Comments on சதீஷ் - மனவுரை!: ஜெ. வழக்கு – இப்போதைய ஆப்ஷன்ஸ்சதீஷ் குமார்http://www.blogger.com/profile/12950392580370904006noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post-71219536858753292932015-04-12T16:15:19.012+05:302015-04-12T16:15:19.012+05:30Dear Mahesh Sir
The reason for transferring the ca...Dear Mahesh Sir<br />The reason for transferring the case to Karnataka itself clarifies all your contentions and assumptions. When the case was proceeded in TN and when AIADMK was ruling the state, most of the witnesses where threatened and they made forced to turn in favour of the offenders. Few documents which under the Anti Corruption wing was also suddenly missed. The consequences on these cases openly and clearly confirmed that the government is trying to fool the judiciary with the help of their power. This was confirmed by the SCI, and hence honble SCI transferred the case to Karnataka for a fair trail and to establish justice. Still the convicts threatened Adv Acharya and that was also noted by the courts. Even the courts noted that Bhawani singh was now favouring the convicts and courts got the clue how he was made to do so. Hence transferring of the case is purely based on convicts attitude and nothing wrong in it. We the people of India now expect a fair justice which retaliate the faith on Indian Judiciary.சதீஷ் குமார்https://www.blogger.com/profile/12950392580370904006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post-13237061388509724182015-04-12T11:48:43.537+05:302015-04-12T11:48:43.537+05:30OPTIONS BEFORE SUPREME COURT - THE MOCKERY OF JUD...OPTIONS BEFORE SUPREME COURT - THE MOCKERY OF JUDICIARY DUE TO SCI ACTION OVERREACH IN 2003 -ILLEGAL REGISTRATION OF DMK / ANBAZAGAN PETITION SINCE NOT MAINTAINABLE BEFORE SCI IN 2003#ALLOWING THE NON-MAINTAINABLE PETITION BY TRANSFER OF TN DA CASE BY ITS IMPUGNED ADMINISTATIVE TRANSFER ORDER DT 18-11-2003 SINCE UNCONSTITUTIONAL #VICTIATED #UNTENABLE AND VOIDABLE ABINITIO - THE SAID SCI ORDER CANNOT BE OPERATIVE THUS CALLS FOR SUO MOTTO REVIEW AND RECALL BY SCI AND ORDER TE-TRIAL BEFORE TERITORIAL JURISDICTIONAL COURT IN TN STATE AFRESH WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD WHILE TAKING SEVERE ACTION AGAINST DMK / ANBAZAGAN UNDER SECTIONS 195 AND 340 CRPC IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUALITY OF ALL STAKE HOLDERS IN THE CADE#Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03071560035522596157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post-35701648789771843792015-04-12T11:40:05.298+05:302015-04-12T11:40:05.298+05:30TAMIL NADU DA CASE TRANSFER BY SCI BY ITS IMPUGNED...TAMIL NADU DA CASE TRANSFER BY SCI BY ITS IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 18-11-2003 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL #VICTIATED #UNTENABLE AND VOIDABLE ABINITIO#AS SUCH CANNOT BE OPERATIVE IN FIRST PLACE#MY COGENT REASONS IN SUPPORT IS AS FOLLOWS#(1)DMK'S ANBAZAGAN PETITION 2003 MAKING WILD ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SPP SOL.COURT CHENNAI IS AS GOOD AS COMPLAINT AGAINST THE SPL.COURT CHENNAI ITSELF ,SINCE COMPETITENT AUTHORITY OVER SPL.COURT CHENNAI IS THE PRESIDING JUDGE AND HE IS EMPOWERED WITH ABSOLUTE POWERS TO DECIDE THE COURSE OF TRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN A GIVEN CASE BEFORE THE COURT IN WHICH NONE HAS POWERS TO INTERFERE WITH#HENCE COMPLAINT BY ANBAZAGAN UNTENABLE#EVEN IF ANY PERSON HAS ANY GRIEVANCE AGAINST SPL.COURT CHENNAI IN 2003 ONE COULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO MAKE A COMPLAINT BEFORE THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS ,SINCE ALL LOWER JUDICIARY REPORTS TO REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AND CHIEF JUSTICE OF HIGH COURT OF MADRAS AS HE IS THE SUPRIENTENDENT AUTHORITY TO LOWER JUDICIARY OF TN#THUS ANBAZAGAN PETITION IN 2003 BEFORE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA #NOTHING BUT ABUSE OF DUE PROCESS OF COURTS AND COMMITTING PERJURY BY MIS-LEADING AND MIS-REPRESENATION BEFORE TO GET ORDER IN FAVOUR,HENCE WHOLE PROCEDINGS VICTIATED POST18-11-2003 BEFORE SPL.COURT BANGALORE #ACCORDING TO CONSTITUTION OF INDIA KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT / HC KAR BANGALORE LACKS TERITORIAL JURISDICTION TO HEAR TN EXECUTIVES CASE AND PROSECUTION OF TN DA CASE IN KARNATAKA MOCKERY OF JUDICIARY / DEMOCRACY/SYSTEM #HENCE UNTENABLE AS VOIDABLE ABINITIO #JAIHIND#Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03071560035522596157noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post-45169005763949227522015-04-11T22:37:57.241+05:302015-04-11T22:37:57.241+05:30முந்தைய வழக்கில் ஆஜராக அவருக்கு அனுமதி இருக்கிற...முந்தைய வழக்கில் ஆஜராக அவருக்கு அனுமதி இருக்கிறது. அப்பீல் வழக்கில் ஆஜராக தான் அனுமதியில்லை. என்னை பொறுத்தவரை அப்பீலில் அவர் ஆஜரானதில் எந்த தவறும் இல்லைசதீஷ் குமார்https://www.blogger.com/profile/12950392580370904006noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6219329859449286802.post-25882531107281779302015-04-11T22:30:08.288+05:302015-04-11T22:30:08.288+05:30அன்பு நண்பரே,
நல்ல விளக்கமான கண்ணோட்டம்.
கூடுதலாக...அன்பு நண்பரே,<br />நல்ல விளக்கமான கண்ணோட்டம். <br />கூடுதலாக எனக்கு தோன்றிய ஒரு கருத்து : மேல் முறையீட்டில் பவானி சிங்கை நியமித்தது சரியில்லை என்று ஒரு வேளை தீர்ப்பு வரக்கூடுமெனில், அதையே காரணம் காட்டி, முந்தைய வழக்கிலும் அவர் ஆஜரானது செல்லாது, எனவே வழக்கை முழுமையாக திரும்ப முதலில் இருந்தே நடத்த வேண்டும் என்று மனுச்செய்தால் கதி என்னவாகும்?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com